SB 1070 COPYCATS. Federal Judge Waddoups has temporarily barred a Utah law – similar to Arizona’s anti-immigrant law, SB 1070 – from taking effect. HB 497 would give new, expanded powers to state and local police to question people they detained about immigration status. In a lawsuit, the ACLU and other groups claimed the law would interfere with federal immigration law and lead to racial profiling. The judge did not rule on the law, but set a hearing for July 14. Class action lawsuits were also filed in Indiana and Georgia, challenging discriminatory laws inspired by SB 1070.
In Arizona, Governor Brewer has appealed the injunction against SB 1070 to the U.S. Supreme Court after the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court’s order placing the law on hold until a decision on the merits can be reached in the lawsuit filed against Arizona by the U.S. Department of Justice.
E-VERIFY. By a 5-3 vote, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld Arizona’s law penalizing businesses and imposing sanctions on employers that hire undocumented workers, rejecting arguments that states have no role in immigration matters. The 2007 law requires that employers use E-Verify – a federal employment verification program that has a disproportionate negative impact on APIs – or risk losing their business licenses. The decision comes as the state is appealing a ruling that blocked SB 1070 from going into effect.
Meanwhile, Rep. Smith (R-TX) has announced that he will introduce a bill to make E-Verify mandatory in June.
IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT. In a 43-22 vote, the California Assembly passed the TRUST Act (AB 1081), sponsored by Asm. Ammiano (D-SF). The bill seeks to repair the damaging impacts of ICE’s Secure Communities program (S-Comm), which has faced criticism for undermining public safety and functioning without transparency or local oversight.
This follows a move by Illinois Governor Quinn to cancel his state’s participation in the program, as well as a move by New York Governor Cuomo to suspend participation in the controversial program.
CHINESE EXCLUSION ACT. Reps. Chu (D-CA) and Biggert (R-IL), and Sens. Brown (R-MA), Feinstein (D-CA), Hatch (R-UT), Murray (D-WA), Cardin (D-MD), and Rubio (R-FL) have introduced resolutions calling on Congress to formally acknowledge and express regret for the passage of the Chinese Exclusion Laws. Enacted between 1882 and 1904, the Chinese Exclusion Laws were a set of laws that severely restricted the naturalization and immigration into the U.S. of people of Chinese descent. Although the laws were repealed in 1943, Congress has never formally acknowledged or expressed regret for the harm and destruction these discriminatory laws caused in the API community.
JAPANESE INTERNMENT. The U.S. Department of Justice released an unprecedented admission in Japanese American incarceration cases, finally admitted its mistakes in the cases challenging the government’s World War II incarceration of Japanese Americans. The “confession of error,” by acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal, is the first such admission of wrongdoing since the 1940s, when the Supreme Court ruled against Korematsu and Hirabayashi, two young men who challenged the incarceration and related curfew orders that compromised the civil rights of Japanese Americans.
IMMIGRATION REFORM. In a recent speech in El Paso, TX, President Obama renewed his call for comprehensive immigration reform (CIR), unveiling a blueprint entitled, “Building a 21st Century Immigration System.” This follows increased pressure from immigrant rights advocates to take action on CIR.
Meanwhile, Democratic legislators are calling on Obama to step up on providing administrative relief for immigrants – to scale back his aggressive deportation policy, particularly in cases when children are seeking an education or families would be split apart.
IMMIGRANT STUDENTS. Policies benefiting DREAM Act-eligible youth have recently moved forward in several states. Maryland’s legislature passed a bill that would allow undocumented students to qualify for resident tuition in state colleges and universities. The Illinois legislature passed a law creating a DREAM Fund, which would raise private money and award scholarships to worthy immigrant students (California is considering similar legislation). In California, the California DREAM Act has advanced, which would allow undocumented university students to apply for financial aid in the state.
Sen. Durbin (D-IL), Rep. Berman (D-CA) and others have also reintroduced the DREAM Act – which has been introduced every year in Congress since 2001.
INDEFINITE DETENTION. The House Immigration Subcommittee recently held a hearing on a bill introduced by Rep. Smith (R-TX), which would give the DHS Secretary authority to detain immigrants indefinitely if they are subject to a final order of removal and cannot be deported for some reason, or if they are subject to a removal order that has been stayed by a judge while their immigration case is on appeal. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Zadvydas v. Davis (2001), that immigrants who have been ordered removed cannot be imprisoned by the government for more than 6 months if there is no reasonable likelihood that the individual will be removed. The “Keep Our Communities Safe” Act would eliminate the 6-month time limit.
More than half of the people in immigration detention have never been convicted of any crime. H.R. 1932 would, in effect, mean life in prison for certain immigrants who have been ordered removed but who cannot be deported because, for example, the immigrant’s country of origin will not accept deportees from the U.S. Moreover, countries like China, India, Iran and Laos are very slow to issue travel documents to ICE.
RIGHT TO EDUCATION. In a joint letter, the U.S. Departments of Justice and Education recently reminded school districts that all students, regardless of their immigration status, can enroll at public schools. The letter issued a stern warning to districts that student enrollment practices that may “lead to the exclusion of students based on their or their parents’ or guardians’ actual or perceived immigration status” would “contravene Federal law.”
U-VISAS. The U.S. Department of Labor has issued new protocols, laying out guidelines and procedures on when and whether to certify/complete a petition for a U-Visa.
****************************
WATCH OUT FOR:
Dream Act (House: 12 co-sponsors, Senate: 34 co-sponsors).
Reuniting Families Act (House: 77 co-sponsors).
Birthright Citizenship Act of 2011 (House: 76 co-sponsors, Senate: 4 co-sponsors).
